Black Friday and Midnight Sales at Illinois Outlet Malls Below are popular outlets in Illinois with holiday hours and links to coupons and specials. Because outlet stores do not always have to follow outlet mall hours, it is a good idea to call a particular store that you are interested in shopping during special mall hours to make sure it will be opened. Premium Outlets will be running the "After Thanksgiving Weekend Sale featuring Midnight Madness" event at the Chicago Premium Outlets in Aurora and the Huntley Outlet Center in Huntley. This is Premium Outlets biggest sale event of the year. Most stores will be opening at midnight with specials for the midnight shoppers. Chicago Premium Outlets in AuroraFriday, Nov. Henckles Opening at 10pm: Aerosoles, Banana Republic, BCBG Max Azria, Benetton, Brooks Brothers, Calvin Klein, Chico's, Converse, Dooney Bourke, Ecco, Guess Factory Accessories, Guess, HanesBrands, Hugo Boss, Jockey, Johnston Murphy, Juicy Couture, Lacoste, Lucky Brand, Mrs. Fields/TCBY, Naturalizer, Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory, Sarar, Skechers, Spyder, Stride Rite Keds Sperry, Ultra Diamonds Opening at 11pm: Diesel, Lids For Less For the individual stores' promotions visit: Chicago Premium Outlets Coupons and Sales Huntley Outlet Center Huntley, IL Tanget Outlet is holding the "Moonlight Madness and After Thanksgiving Sale" with stores opening at 10pm on Thanksgiving night. This year Tanger is offering shoppers various ways to connect to additional savings and rewards: "Deals After Dark" 20% a Single Item (participation stores) Must download or pickup by November 21. Nov. 22 23. "Deals at Dawn" 30% off a single item at participating stores. Must download or pickup by November 21. Nov. 23. "Text To Win Moonlight Sweepstakes" Tanger will give customers using mobile devices the chance to win one of four $1,000 Tanger Shopping Sprees during the After Thanksgiving shopping weekend. Shoppers 18 years or older are invited to Text "MOONLIGHT" to 74700 to join Tanger Mobile Deals and be entered. everyday November 23 26 with instructions on how to pick up their gift card at the nearest Tanger shopping center. Note: On the Tanger website it says to text SHOP4ME to 74700. I'll make a note when I get clarification, but both should work. November 1 through November 30, shoppers who download the Tanger app for their iPhone or Android will receive a free holiday compact mirror while supplies last.
Coach Purses What is coach purse is made out of? COACH is riding in style, thanks to the firm's leather items and some savvy licensing deals. The company designs and makes (mostly through third parties) high end leather goods and accessories, including purses, wallets, and luggage. The luxury brand sells its wares through some 930 department and outlet stores (in the US and more than 20 other countries), catalogs, and its Web site. Macy's, Nordstrom, Saks, and others carry Coach items. It also runs about 520 retail and factory outlet stores in North America, Japan, and China (including Hong Kong and Macau). There are several ways that you can tell. Make sure that the Coach logo on the outside is centered and that each C is a mirror image, The dustbag should be chocolate brown and have the Coach Ext. 1941 written on it, The zipper should say that it is a YKK zipper, The stitching should be double stitched and of high quality, and there is a serial number in the bag that should look neatly made and be written in English and that would be verifiable on the Coach toll free customer service line. Are coach purses made in Costa Rica? No. If you have a real one they usually have a leather square on the inside saying the serial number and where it was manufactured. It says that ALL real Coach bags are made in China. I apologise for having to disagree with this answer, but the correct answer is TRUE! While most (not all) current Coach bags are being made in China in the present, Coach was manufactured in many other countries in the past. These include, but are not limited to: The United States, Costa Rica, Hungary, Mexico, Dominican Republic, Turkey, India and Italy! I have had several authentic Coach bags from several of these countries, and currently carry a vintage Willis Cross body Coach that was manufactured in Costa Rica. How would you rate the quality of Coach purses? Really nice quality; they'll last a long time. However, I don't believe they're worth the amount coach asks for. My letter to Coach Dear Sirs, I sent my Coach Hobo bag in for repair, which my husband purchased for me about 25 years ago. The bag carries a lifetime warranty; however your service department decided it was not worth repairing the bag. I have been a Coach patron for the past 25 years, and own several of your purses. I'm the original owner of the bag and I disagree that it's not repairable. Although the bag has lived up to its expectation, your customer service doesn't. In contrast, Hartman luggage, which also carries a lifetime repair warranty, fixed a 25+ year old bag for free; Hartman keeps its promise of guaranty to their customers. I paid a premium for the Coach bag and expect Coach to live up to its warranty. I also paid $20 for the shipping and got nothing in return. This is not the time to renege on your promises to lifetime customers. How can original coach purses be identified? 1 If a Coach handbag has the "C or CC" Pattern, then the pattern could be employed to inspect the purse for authenticity. start looking on the purse and figure out when the "C or CC" pattern is heading directly up and down. The pattern ought to be centered for the entrance and back again panel within the purse. and also the seam will go directly via the "C or CC" pattern, the letters won't be cut. 2 The stitching in a very Coach purse is impeccable, the stitching of an reliable Coach Handbag is uniform with double stitching. something much less is identified as a fake handbag. 3 There ought to be a leather based ingredients label using a serial quantity on the vast majority within the reliable Coach handbags that starts with 'No'. The ingredients label is situated for the within the handbag. There is not just a leather based ingredients label on some within the more compact reliable Coach purses. These models without the need of a ingredients label would be the clutch, swingback, and also the mini. 4 Only a Coach traditional Handbag arrives without the need of a lining,Prada handbags, otherwise an reliable Coach Handbag is lined. This is identified as a certain method to figure out when the handbag is identified as a fake when the lining is missing. 5 The zipper of an reliable Coach handbag ought to be engraved with YKK and zip smoothly. The reason for the longevity of the products isn't only the high quality of hides, which obtains a patina of age, but also by the bronze and steel rivets are used to create the products. The top quality and design coach purse is still true, as their production over 60 years. Fans of this line of brand remains stronger than ever. Celebrities and individuals of distinct origins can be seen all over the world with one of these magnificent handbags. Coach products fall into the category of cost effective luxury. Handbags and other products of coaches is recognized as a brand that is priced high enough to be appreciated by the upper class, but at the same time low enough for the middle class to buy and feel worthy of . Coach products, you'll be able to even locate in stores, Coach Handbags, small shops and boutiques for the rich and famous have been detected in outlet malls buying coach bags. Who does not like saving a dollar or two from time to time. The easiest way to tell a fake Coach bag from a real one is to know what the authentic looks like.2 Inspect the fake bag. Coach executives studied two fake bags sold by counterfeiters and they identified the differences between the real and fake. They point out that the hardware should be real brass, which is heavy. Often fake bags are made with a flimsy metal that can easily tarnish. Heaviness is also something to look for when it comes to the leather. Coach uses 6 ounce hides, which is very thick.3 Look at the details: The lining in a real Coach bag is stitched in, not clued like fake bags. The zippers should be sturdy and easy to maneuver. The stitching of the leather should be clean and straight; often fake Coach bags will have crooked or irregular stitching. Coach uses twelve stitches for every inch; consider this when inspecting a bag.4 Check for tell tale signs. If the bag is said to be "Made in Korea", this is a dead give away it is a fake. Coach bags are made in China. Look at the signature Coach print, which is a "C". If they are crooked, off center, uneven, or odd looking, then the bag is a fake.5 Consider the price. Real Coach bags can retail from $150 to $500 depending on the style. Fake Coach bags are often sold for less than $100.6 Be wary of dubious locations. Where one is buying the bag is often a sign as to whether the bag is fake or real. Street vendors, eBay, iOffer, mall kiosks, and even purse parties are all places known to sell fake Coach bags. A Coach outlet or a reputable Coach reseller are all known to sell authentic Coach products. When considering buying a bag from an on line seller, ask to see pictures of the individual bag. Some sellers will post stock pictures, which are pictures the reputable stores use.
European Union clears final hurdle to postal privatisation The European Union has cleared the final hurdle to full competition in the 88 billion euro postal market by 2011. The agreement amongst Europe's postal carriers will allow any private operator to carry mail under 50 grams. Only three countries Sweden, Finland and the United Kingdom have been fully liberalised. One of the major sticking points over the 2011 deadline was the Universal Service Obligation (USO). Big business has fought long and hard for the abolition of the so called "reserved area," whereby operators retained a national monopoly on letters weighing less than 50 grams in Europe. National monopolies in this reserved area previously provided for all EU citizens to be entitled to have their mail collected and delivered at least once a day, five days a week. Private operators will now be able to enter this lucrative market, 85 percent of which is business mail, creaming off the most profitable areas without having to comply with the USO. This will make the task of meeting the USO ever more costly to national carriers and must inevitably result in its abandonment. The struggle by European big business to privatise the major national carriers began in earnest in 1997 when the EU passed its directive, amended in 2003, that demanded each member state open its national postal service to competition. This privatisation process is the major factor in the huge attacks that are being carried out on postal workers in Europe. The two countries that have served as a privatisation template have been Sweden and Germany. Sweden and Germany Sweden was the first industrialised country to end its national postal monopoly in 1983 a full two years before the country joined the EU. Posten AB was completely restructured in order to compete with its main rival, Citymail. Since the 1990s, massive job losses have taken place, slashing the workforce from 72,000 to 38,000. The introduction of part time workers has also increased to almost one third. Germany's path to privatisation also began in the early 1980s, when the express parcel business market was opened up to competitors. Bundespost then separated into three businesses, similar to a development in the UK. However, the first significant privatisation inroad in Germany's post came with the 1997 directive calling for the liberalisation of Europe's postal networks. In 2003, cross border mail was opened to competition. The German market was worth 23 billion euros by 2006, with 75 percent of this market open for competition. Postal workers in are currently involved in a bitter battle to defend pay and conditions against plans to impose "total flexibility," with the loss of more than 40,000 jobs and substantial cuts in pensions. In 1986, the Post Office was split into four separate businesses one of which, Royal Mail, was further restructured in 1992, reducing 64 postal districts to nine divisions, with significant job losses. In 1999, the Labour government's trade secretary, Peter Mandelson, put forward a new commercial structure, which involved "the most radical set of reforms since the modern Post Office was created in 1969." The Labour government opened up UK postal services to full competition on January 1, 2006 three years ahead of the deadline demanded by the 1997 EU directive. The Labour government has pressed forward the privatisation of postal services with even greater determination than the Conservative government it replaced. Belgium and Poland Like many other national operators, Belgium's De Post had a state monopoly, organised as a company under central government control. In 1991, it was given autonomy. This move set the scene for it to be made into a limited company in 2000. In 2005, shareholders were allowed, with the Belgium state still retaining more than 50 percent of the shares. Since then, De Post has followed the EU timetable of liberalisation. The Belgian post office (La Poste/De Post) has been undergoing a major internal restructuring since 2000. The company early on recognised that it had to carry out a massive reduction in costs and manpower. To do this, management introduced the Goroute software in 2002. This Canadian programme aimed to rationalise the distribution of mail by optimising delivery rounds, requiring a smaller workforce. It provoked a large number of strikes during 2003, 2004 and 2006, against a significant increase in the workload and the loss of 2,500 jobs. Towards the end of 2005, La Poste/De Post carried out the second stage of its technology upgrade, Goroute 2. Another 1,000 jobs were cut. Belgium recently abstained on the new EU agreement. Under the control of the Stalinists, Poczta Polska was a state monopoly, with the government controlling 99.1 percent. While the Polish national carrier has not been formally privatised, it has been forced to compete with an increasing number of private operators, including TNT and DHL. From 1994 to 2005, the number of private operators in Poland increased from 15 to 113. A global offensive The globalisation of trade and industry has undermined nationally based postal monopolies and forced them to compete at home and abroad against their international rivals. The enormous growth of e mail has seen letter services internationally drive to cut costs and create new markets for parcel deliveries via Internet shopping. Half of the population in Europe now has Internet connection and access to e mail. The nationally based postal networks were bound up with an earlier stage in the development of capitalism. As a paper at a recent Uni Postal Global Union Conference in Athens explained, "Whilst in its early days the regular postal service was used mainly by patrician and merchant families to send information (and move people in the post coach) between states, during the 19th century postal services developed into a country wide and close knit network for the dispatch of written documents and goods. "With the development of notions of the modern state based on social cohesion the provision of efficient utilities such as water supply, mains electricity, roads and postal services as well as general public access to these networks came to be seen as a central task of government. In order for these services to be run economically by carrying sufficient items and also to allow for cross funding between profitable and unprofitable parts of the service, these state enterprises were shielded from private competition. Equipped with exclusive rights these monopolies were obliged as part of their condition of supply to provide their service throughout the country to all citizens at a uniformly low cost. This link between an obligation to provide a universal service as part of the duty of the state and the exclusion of competition was long accepted as uneconomic necessity by the body politic and society at large for utilities and particularly for postal services." Government and big business are no longer prepared to accept such "uneconomic necessity." To slash public spending in the form of subsidies and to enable formerly national services to compete in an international market, the postal networks across Europe are to be "liberalised." The end result will not be a harmonious, European wide telecommunications industry. The European bourgeoisie is incapable of carrying forward such a progressive and necessary development. Rather, the EU's plans clear the way for fratricidal competition within the postal industry. In February of this year, the European Commission launched an inquiry into the UK government's funding of Royal Mail through non commercial loans, after complaints reportedly received from the company's main European rivals, Deutsche Post and TNT. The cost of privatisation will be borne by postal workers in the loss of their jobs and attacks on wages and working conditions and the population at large. According to Jon Pedersen of UNI Europa (representing unions across Europe), "Ten years of postal liberalisation in Europe have so far meant fewer postal outlets, fewer mail boxes and longer distances to access the post. For workers in the postal sector it has meant fewer jobs, precarious employment and downward competition on wages wage dumping. All this has been contrary to EU promises." As a result of privatisation in Sweden, 25 percent of post offices have closed and, as mentioned above, thousands of postal jobs slashed. In Italy, jobs have fallen from 220,000 to 150,000, while at Deutsche Post, jobs have been halved. In Holland, TNT Post, the former Dutch monopoly mail operator, said it is cutting 7,000 jobs and freezing pay. In New Zealand, the same process saw 43 percent of jobs disappear. Pedersen's complaint notwithstanding, the unions across Europe have enabled the EU and the respective national governments and corporations to implement their plans. In every country, the various union leaders are imposing the attacks on postal workers jobs and conditions demanded by the employers. The betrayals of strikes such as the current one in the UK are not merely the result of bad leaders. The degeneration of the old workers' organisations is the product of their nationalist and reformist programme and organisation. When production was predominantly organised within national borders, it was possible to extract certain concessions from the employers through strikes and protests, without challenging the essential framework of the profit system. Today, the union bureaucracy has abandoned such a struggle in direct response to the ability of the major corporations to organise globally.cheap coach cheap coach purses cheap coach bags cheap coach handbags coach purses on sale coach sale coach bags on sale coach handbags sale